Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Kohler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Kohler[edit]

Graham Kohler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. One of a glut of of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. gadfium 08:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per nom. Lacks significant independent third party coverage, therefore fails WP:GNG. Creator's raison d'etre on wiki seems to be the perpetual promotion of St Peter's College and I have long suspected COI. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 08:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No evidence of notability. Brief mentions in a few news articles, but nothing significant exists. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:42, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nom and NinjaRobotPirate - SimonLyall (talk) 01:47, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.