Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Dyson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Dyson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This guy actually is mentioned in a lot of news, but always in the form of "he said something in response to some police-related event that happened recently", almost never any coverage about him personally. The only exception I see is that one time he rode a bicycle for a long way as a charity thing, which is... also questionably notable. ℰmi1y_⧼T·C⧽ 21:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Police, and England. ℰmi1y_⧼T·C⧽ 21:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The subject appears to be a police officer who does a good job and is occasionally quoted by local media. Notability is not shown by the limited coverage the subject has received. Sorely fails WP:GNG and clearly does not meet WP:BASIC. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the West Yorkshire Police. He's not notable by himself, is usually the media contact for whatever event/crime/thing the police are working on. Oaktree b (talk) 02:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. NN relatively junior officer. No point in a redirect to his force, where he isn't (and shouldn't be) mentioned. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable enough to necessitate an independent article JRed176 (talk) 21:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unremarkable career that fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 04:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He is a good officer, but that does not make him notable. NMasiha (talk) 18:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.