Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Dugoni
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:25, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Graham Dugoni[edit]
- Graham Dugoni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I prodded this because the league he now plays in and the team he now plays on are not fully professional. Creator agreed to this, but deprodded because: "agreed that he fails WP:NSPORT... passes WP:GNG by being part of a championship-winning team in the US (2010 PDL champs)". Question: how can an amateur football competition be notable, and how can being a team member pass WP:GNG, minding WP:INHERIT? Geschichte (talk) 17:54, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 06:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 06:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 01:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - agree with nom, fails both WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 01:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: in answer to your first question, many amateur competitions are notable. The FIFA World Cup and all it's various age group and women's tournament spin-offs are technically amateur. The Chatham Cup is a probably a more appropriate football example for your meaning. That does not, however, mean that each player participating in that competition is notable.--ClubOranjeT 06:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as stated by nom, notability is not inherited. Without significant coverage or an appearance in a fully pro league, he fails both WP:GNG, and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.