Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Deakin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 20:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Deakin[edit]

Has not made an appearance in a fully professional league, so fails WP:BIO. robwingfield ^«T•C» 22:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. robwingfield ^«T•C» 23:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has played in a competitive game between two fully-professional clubs (Football League Trophy, Walsall v Swansea). пﮟოьεԻ 57 23:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - this still results in the article failing WP:BIO, so the article remains non-notable. robwingfield ^«T•C» 17:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Number57. matt91486 (talk) 06:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable lower-level footballer. One Football League Trophy game is obviously less notable than playing for England U-19 or sitting on the bench in the CL. Sebisthlm (talk) 10:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. To clarify, this is a case where "meeting one or more [criteria] does not guarantee that a subject should be included" (WP:BIO#Additional criteria, second sentence). Sebisthlm (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails notability Bardcom (talk) 14:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Alexf⁴² 13:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.