Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grafton Recruitment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grafton Recruitment[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed the PROD because the prodder didn't use an edit summary. The original prod rationale was not notable and this is a company. I'm getting some Gnews hits but many are in Polish so I think this needs to be discussed before it gets deleted anyway. Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:52, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, weakly. Google News shows a number of hits, but the first several pages I was able to reach seemed to all be routine announcements of acquisitions/hirings/departures, press releases, and stories about job markets generally in which firm representatives were quoted as sources. No indication that this firm has ever invented anything significant, become any kind of cultural icon, or had any significant effect in history of the kind that would make it an encyclopedia subject. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.