Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Govindini Murty (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Govindini Murty[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a journalist, not reliably sourced as passing our notability criteria for journalists. Right across the board, this is referenced entirely to sources that are not proper support for notability: directories of her own work on the self-published websites of her own employers, 13 pieces of her own bylined writing about other topics, four more pieces of writing bylined by one of her business partners, Facebook posts, an IMDb page, an online store, a circular citation to another Wikipedia article, content on the self-published websites of directly affiliated organizations or companies, and glancing namechecks of her existence in sources that aren't about her in any non-trivial sense. As always, however, notability is not a question of verifying the extent to which she's been the author of media coverage of other things, it's a question of verifying the extent to which she's been the subject of media coverage written by other people — but out of 35 footnotes here, not even one represents third party coverage about her in a reliable media outlet independent of her, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced much, much better than this. Bearcat (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The huffington bio says 'writer and filmmaker'. None of the sources demonstrate that she qualifies WP:CREATIVE since none of her written or visual work has been a part of multiple periodicals or articles. Simply creating stuffing and putting it out is not sufficient. The work needs to be discussed in reliable independent sources. Also, her huffington write ups end with Govindini Murty’s current film project is the WWII sci-fi short film UFO Diary, available now on Vimeo. Visit UFO Diary on Facebook and join the film’s almost 10,000 fans.) which indicates it is not a journalistic effort but a promotional effort to write this piece and seek attention through it. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:39, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:52, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.