Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Govindachandra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep Kings are notable. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Govindachandra[edit]

references Janc6 (talk) 20:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Gbooks has plenty of hits, so a valid article, especially in light of the sequence of articles that are interlinked via the Candra dynasty page. While not an ideal case, the author has mentioned in the edit summary that it is being expanded. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly notable as demonstrated by SpacemanSpliff's research. Yes, it needs to be referenced and expanded but oh well. Drawn Some (talk) 21:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.