Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gossipreport.com (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gossipreport.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable site that only managed to get mentions in local news media. Wikipedia notability requires national coverage or other non-trivial coverage or else EVERYTHING could be deemed notable. DreamGuy (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:31, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete don't see indepth coverage. mentions in the media merely verify existence rather than establish notability. LibStar (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.