Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goro Nagase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Goro Nagase[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A few publications and not having scholarly publications for many years 01:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for Goro Nagase (talk) 01:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC) --DoNotTellDoNotAsk (talk) 00:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Delete, as not notable. Paul August ☎ 03:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @105 · 01:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. "not having scholarly publications for many years" is not a reason for deletion. Once notable, always notable. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I do agree with you - There is no consistency in wiki notability especially for professors. --DoNotTellDoNotAsk (talk) 02:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While I agree with Eastmain on the poorly justified nom (Alfred Einstein hasn't published anything for years either, shall we delete his article?), this professor has approximately one publication which has been cited 43 times. Not very influential. Fails WP:PROF, and every other notability guideline as far as I can tell. Wine Guy~Talk 02:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. As much as I prefer to keep things where possible, I lean slightly towards Win Guy on overall notability of this professor. LotLE×talk 07:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He doesn't have a lot of publications, but I think Nagase is notable as a teaching professor. Barely, maybe, but notable. He is a university professor, he has won awards, and he has started an endowment. MiRroar (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment' in such situations it would be good to see Some % of teaching @university added to wiki notability for professors --DoNotTellDoNotAsk (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete what we usually want to establish notability as a teacher is an award from outside the university. His awards are all from within the university except for "(National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education) research achievement award in 1991", and why he received it when he has done so little research is not clear to me. DGG ( talk ) 05:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.