Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gori Tori Chunari Ba Lal Lal Re

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Ritesh Pandey (singer). And protect. Sandstein 14:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gori Tori Chunari Ba Lal Lal Re[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SONG. A song with no standalone notability. Was recreated for the third time after speedy deletion. Zoodino (talk) 07:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Zoodino (talk) 07:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Zoodino (talk) 07:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt per nomination. I couldn't get the third link to open, but even if it worked, "one of the most googled Indian songs" isn't sufficient to pass WP:NSONG. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article looks like it has references to reliable sources like Times of India, etc. but those are to the publicity services at those papers in which they allow musicians to post links to their videos, announce new releases, etc. (BBC in England does something similar.) This song has not been reviewed or critically analyzed in any reliable source, and only appears in the typical streaming and retail listings. This title could possibly be redirected to the singer's article if required by policy, but it is pretty obvious that someone is trying repeatedly to promote this song. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ritesh Pandey (singer): The song is mentioned in a number of articles, but was barely discussed. An article about its music video isn't good enough to pass WP:NSONG. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 05:35, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt - still not notable Spiderone 07:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete - It is one of the most googled song, and has been recreated several times. It meets WP: Songs.Instead, It should be improved. NIA3000 (talk) 09:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment NIA3000, as the (re-)creator of this page, please could you explain which of the WP:NSONG criteria you believe the song passes? ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is one of the most Googled song, which shows it's notability, secondly it has been independently released by several artist. That's why, correct me if I'm wrong somewhere! NIA3000 (talk) 09:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of your statements demonstrate notability - the WP:NSONG guidelines stipulate that the song should have been recorded "by several notable artists, bands, or groups" (my emphasis).

In addition, please could you sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~), so everyone can see whose comment it is. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 13:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NIA3000, if you believe the article is good enough to meet WP:NSONG, prove it by showing us some reliable articles which show in-depth discussion about the song. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.