Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gore Slut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I decided against closing as merge because there are no reliable sources verifying the material in the article. If anyone wants this userfied so they can source and merge the material, I'd be happy to do so. —Darkwind (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gore Slut[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musical group. Only reference appears to be the personal website of one of the members. No evidence of charting or awards. (I previously PROD'd this article with this rationale, but it was undeleted, so I'm bringing it to AfD). Stuartyeates (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to (at at least summarize in) Rudy Trouvé. Marginally notable but can be adequately covered in that article, I think. --Michig (talk) 19:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's a great idea, but unfortuantely that article also lacks evidence of notability. The two references are the artists website and their record label. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a poor article, but as you will be aware, that doesn't mean that he isn't notable, and there are plenty of GNews and GBooks sources that can be used to improve that article. --Michig (talk) 20:28, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 03:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:29, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.