Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Tipple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 05:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Tipple[edit]

Delete for lack of notability. Article is barely even a stub. Dr.Who 20:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand as has appeared a numerous roles according to imdb. Tim! 06:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looking at his IMDB profile, none of his roles leap out as significant, nor do searches reveal evidence of a significant fan base or "cult" following, which are the criteria one usually applies to actorly notability. At present, the most interesting thing to be said about him is that he barely appears in a TV movie which is considered part of a long-running SF franchise. --Mark H Wilkinson ^{(t, c)} 08:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. —212.32.79.18 11:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete minor roles do not attest notability Corpx 14:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete minor character actor, no coverage in reliable sources. As an aside, I admire the complete lack of WP:COI of the nominator, who even as a Dr Who fan recognizes this article fails notability requirements. Eliz81 ^(talk)^(contribs) 15:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No comment. M.V.E.i. 16:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete CSD A7. Actors act, that's what they do. Looking at IMDB, this seems to be an unremarkable actor and the article does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. --Malcolmxl5 22:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not the slightest sign of real-world impact or notice, nor of actually significant roles. --Calton | Talk 17:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.