Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Franz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Franz[edit]

According to the article "combines a scholar’s love for God’s Word and his archaeological and geographical knowledge of the lands of the Bible"?? This guy seems to be a non-notable Christian archeologist, who's sole claim to fame is some spat with the seemingly slightly more notable Bob Cornuke. I suspect this article may only exist to justify POV pushing on the the Cornuke article, which consists of quote after quote as to why Franz says he's wrong. Delete this one, and then let's crop the other one to the baiscs. -Doc^g 19:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This borders on hero worship. Delete B.Wind 01:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Clear problems with WP:PEACOCK, but afd is not a cleanup site. gsearch shows he may be notable. Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:52, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't bring it here for clean-up. I brought it here because I think it isn't worth an article. If you think otherwise, perhaps you might offer some reasons. Why is he notable? I'm genuinely open to being convinced.--Doc^g 22:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete as per nom.--Buridan 13:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - All footnotes and external links cited in the article are essentially self-published, aren't they? I'll look a bit more for scholarly references ... but am not optimistic. Keesiewonder 01:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.