Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordan-i Shwan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Komala_Party_of_Iranian_Kurdistan. MBisanz ^talk 02:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gordan-i Shwan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to demonstrate Wikipedia:Notability. Pahlevun (talk) 10:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:28, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:28, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Komala_Party_of_Iranian_Kurdistan. This is a NN troup or military cohort. Bearian (talk) 22:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article has no sources. Searching found no sources. Delete because it both can't be verified (there are no sources) and it's not notable (there are no sources) If the content could be verified then delete per WP:MILUNIT Gab4gab (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 13:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unverifiable. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not a "unit" which has shown to have obtained and retained notability and no RS sources. Kierzek (talk) 16:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.