Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goran Dzelatovic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 01:40, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Goran Dzelatovic[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable bodyguard/actor, previously deleted as a7/spam, nothing has changed. Working for notable individuals does not make one notable themselves and he is not exception. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Serbia, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 17:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is someone famous enough if he has the huge fan base https://www.instagram.com/ajkulauk/ (we are talking according to Serbian statistics) and I put links from certain medias to also prove his nobility? Немања 93 (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The number of followers and views are always a poor measure of notability. Anyone can have millions of followers because anyone can create an account and anyone can buy followers. It does not translate to notability because it isn't published in depth coverage. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's really hard to get any data from the time when he was a ice hockey player because there is not much statistics. But that is an important accomplishment that deserves an article. Beside everything already mentioned he also does a lot of charity, for which I have links that could be included. Would that mean enough for his article to exist? Немања 93 (talk) 18:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.