Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goosefoot (Chicago restaurant)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 07:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goosefoot (Chicago restaurant)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability in article. Some local coverage in Chicago. Does have one star in "MICHELIN Guide Chicago" and was rated 8th best Chicago restaurant in 2018 by chicagomag.com. I don't see enough for WP:GNG. MB 02:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MB 02:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. MB 02:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is extensive coverage of this place such as The Small BYOB Restaurant That’s Worth Flying to Chicago For. See WP:NEXIST and WP:ATD: "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." Andrew🐉(talk) 11:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Some would argue the Michelin star makes this notable, albeit that it's not immediately obvious from the article (I've added it to the infobox). I think there are enough decent sources to support it passing WP:COMPANY. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mild Keep Could be notability there, but the article is too short to really judge. No interviews with the owners or mentions in magazines? Needs to really be enhanced as an article. Oaktree b (talk) 16:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.