Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Googlit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Google. Mailer Diablo 11:47, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Googlit[edit]

What is this term?? Is this an article created by a Wikipedian who just thinks this is interesting to have?? I suggest delete if no one can show this is a real term. Georgia guy 21:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Use of this word in the wild seem more to do with Google and an obscure brand of clothing. I remain to be persuaded if anyone can find real-world use. --Billpg 23:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Only in the sense that it is a colloquial term for "google hit" rather than the numerical sense. Gamextheory 17:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't need a merge for that. Only do a merge if content needs to be carried over, which (if I understand correctly), does not apply here. If this article ends up deleted, you can make a new article containing a redirect to Google. --Billpg 19:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Google. Science3456 00:50, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Google per Science3456. Facts&moreFacts 04:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 04:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Googol and Googolplex are real terms, but Googlit is probably something made up in school --light darkness^(talk) 07:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as made-up silliness. Do not redirect. Vslashg (talk) 10:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Google per above. The term is real, but it relates to the Google search engine, not a number. DecGon 13:22, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to google. 64.192.107.242 18:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lightdarkness --Ruby 20:25, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to google. DecGon 18:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to google per above. StarTrek 20:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to google. Car salesman 21:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.