Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoogleTube

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 20:20, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GoogleTube[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neologism, made up word without general acceptance in any language. WP:MADEUP applies. reddogsix (talk) 23:56, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with reddogsix. Delete, but then redirect to YouTube. Pseudonymous Rex (talk) 00:03, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just a random word made up by a random person. Not notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clecol99 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to YouTube per P. Rex. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article was made to promote several lowly viewed YouTube videos. The FaceBook page for this word that the creator, User:Diablo666Daemon666, states has been gaining members fast, has only three likes. It's safe to assume this is very non-notable. Beerest355 Talk 21:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP, BUT EDIT THE PAGE. The page must be made to be non-opinionated. The creator of the word created the Wikipedia page...but that doesnt give you the right to delete it! I feel that the information Diablo666Daemon666 gave was entirely accurate, but needs to be made to LOOK like fact rather than opinion. I propose an edit of the transcript.

The word IS popular. Other users of the site ARE using the word. A Wikipedia page will EVENTUALLY be created, as will a page on UrbanDictionary.

As for the Facebook Page... Well, this page would help its popularity, and that page will help THIS page's popularity. Its a mutual benefit for each to back up the other.

- Mr I. Rate (Ricardo Oliviera, fan) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.60.153 (talk) 01:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The preceding unsigned comment from IP 87.115.60.153 looks very much like contributions from User:Diablo666Daemon666 at Talk:GoogleTube and elsewhere. Note the use of capital letters and the faux signature as "Mr. I. Rate". Diablo666Daemon666 is the creator of GoogleTube, and is perfectly correct to comment in this AfD. I presume that faux signature and editing without logging in are not intended to deceive anyone. Cnilep (talk) 03:27, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, not verifiable by reliable sources, and obvious conflict of interest. --Drm310 (talk) 15:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. I don't see any real value in redirecting, but I won't say I'm against doing so. --BDD (talk) 23:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without redirect, non-notable neologism per WP:NEO, with no coverage that I can see in WP:Reliable sources. There's a rather interesting Firefox add-on with this name, but it doesn't seem to be notable enough yet either per WP:GNG. Captain Conundrum (talk) 08:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.