Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodsell Amplifiers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Goodsell Amplifiers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product. It's not hard to find reviews, but I don't think these inherently establish notability; I'm looking for in-depth coverage of the unique design, features, construction, etc. The article provides no such references, and I'm not having much success finding any. Almost all the viable links and references in the article are self-sourced, so it reads like an advertisement. Mikeblas (talk) 15:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Regretfully. Right now this is just a list of products with very little information about the company itself, and little or no information that I can see which is reliably sourced. That's basically a reflection of the sources available from what I can tell. There's plenty of stuff about the stuff they make, but not about them, which is what is required if we are going write an encyclopedia article rather than a product listing. GMG ^talk 19:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- just a product brochure. Wikipedia is not a free means of promotion. No WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.