Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodrich Petroleum Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Goodrich Petroleum Corporation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGIN. All I can find is mentions about the stock,no other coverage. We know it is a publicly traded company, but there millions of these. Tyros1972 Talk 06:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 07:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - We are continuing update information of this company. Still we need more time and others help. Our supervisor think this company is considerable important in the petroleum area. And some of the public include but not limited of investors may want to know this company. This is one of the reasons we put it on Wikipedia. Talk 15:40, June 2013 (Beijing) —Preceding undated comment added 07:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for promoting and advertising your company. Please see: WP:NOTADVERTISING. Tyros1972 Talk 08:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - like nom, I can't find anything (WP:N, WP:CORP) on this except bare facts about the stock. The "we put it on Wikipedia" suggests a connection with the company, presumably either inside or paid, so use of Wikipedia for Advertising appears likely. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - You can delete it. But "Advertising" is not acceptable for me! Do you need I show you my student id card? Talk (Talk) 15:40, June 2013 (Beijing) —Preceding undated comment added 08:27, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No. Please also consider WP:NOTADVERTISING. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 12:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salt - Considering the creator has admitted why he created this page, I also ask that it be salted. Tyros1972 Talk 08:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, salt if required - Virtually all of the press releases refer to the stock, and nearly zero results for the company itself aside from its website, nothing out there that would satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. The claims made by the creator are also of increasing concern, per WP:COI and WP:PAID. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 12:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.