Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good city

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 20:41, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good city[edit]

Delete - just can't see any way article with this title can be possibly worthwhile --Xorkl000 13:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No notable content in an article on a non-notable subject Kcordina 13:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Title makes little sense and content even less so. ॐ Metta Bubble ^puff 13:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Ter e nc e Ong 16:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete harmonically. Slowmover 17:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree that this articel has nothing to offerAyreon 18:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no context, weak dicdef, and who exactly is Platon? --Kinu ^t/_c 21:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- According to Wikipedia, it was the nickname Plato's wrestling coach gave him. No, really. Kuru ^talk 02:43, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Wow, I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen the Plato article myself. I guess you do learn something new everyday. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uh...I was thinking Speedy Delete when I first saw this...no context or anything... -zappa 01:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete, random with no clue as to context. Kuru ^talk 02:43, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Republic, one of Plato's more well-known works, already has an entry. Brian G. Crawford 18:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.