Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Luck Charlie (Film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 07:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good Luck Charlie (Film)[edit]
- Good Luck Charlie (Film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFF, no reliable sources. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 17:58, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:CRYSTAL at its finest. The only sources that this can be traced to in themselves cite no source, and most are from a few months ago. No prejudice to recreation if, well, there's anything actually worth saying. --Kinu t/c 19:00, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Partially duplicates earlier premature effort to add an article. Sources are indeed vague, blue-sky items; Disney and Hollywood Reporter said only (in July) that a movie is "in development", so I picture the idea coming up at lunches occasionally when producers remember to mention it to each other; meanwhile we've got WP articles with cast lists and writers. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sourced to a non-notable Disney gossip site and it takes awhile for their sitcoms to graduate to movie status. Too soon yet. Nate • (chatter) 05:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Only source in the article is of dubious reliability. Possibly fan-fiction based on the brief announcements; there seems to be a lot of it about, which is pretty typical for Disney articles. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.