Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden bowl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Golden bowl[edit]

It isn't clear what this is about - one of the books in the bibliography is self-published (maybe by the author of the article?), the other's full title includes 'Peasant life in four cultures' - the subject of the book but certainly not the subject of this article! Certainly not notable. Doug Weller (talk) 16:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - Comment*** Sorry, interrupted while writing this and left out the fact that the self-published book is a book about prayers, evidently not about real golden bowls. Doug Weller (talk) 16:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the irrelevant "bibliography". Is the article acceptable now? 0XQ (talk) 16:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, copying any worthwhile information from this article into Holy Grail. If this is a collection of literary references to the Holy Grail as a golden bowl (which as best I can tell is what it seems to be), then if there's anything here worth salvaging it can be incorporated into that article. This certainly doesn't need an article of its own. Moreover, there's an existing disambiguation page, Golden Bowl, that goes to a book by Henry James or a film adapted from it; as it currently stands, someone looking for information on the book or the film might end up at this article instead just because he neglects to capitalize the B, which is why I didn't recommend "Merge"; turning this page into a redirect would leave that problem unsolved... --Smeazel (talk) 17:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added this to the "Holy Grail" article, as suggested, then deleted what I had written here. 0XQ (talk) 23:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. 0XQ has now deleted all content from the article. Axl (talk) 17:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.