Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Boy Records (Record Label)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 07:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Boy Records (Record Label)[edit]

Golden Boy Records (Record Label) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fairly minor record label with single source. Can't see how they are notable. scope_creep (talk) 11:13, 24 December 2016 (UTC) scope_creep (talk) 11:13, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No sign of significant notability or impact in the music industry. Speedy deletion. Scorpion293 (talk) 20:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lepricavark (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane talk 08:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not notable at all and has an air of the promotional. None of the artist on the roster are of note. Karst (talk) 10:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- unreliably sourced spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There are no credible claims of significance here. No notable artists or releases or coverage. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.