Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golam Rabby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Golam Rabby[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not fulfill the notability criteria mentioned at WP:ENT or WP:AUTHOR. Also, it doesn't have WP:SIGCOV that could pass WP:GNG. —MdsShakil (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Journalism, and Bangladesh. —MdsShakil (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Doesn't pass GNG as it lacks significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 16:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There seems to be No Reliable Sources. Untamed1910 (talk) 14:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. Llajwa (talk) 20:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. -- আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Devokewater|(tαlk) 20:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.