Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glued money

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glued money[edit]

This article about a type of prank is uncited & unverfied, and besides, Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Ginkgo100^talk 18:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC) EDIT: This article is not eligible for speedy deletion or I would already have done it. Prod was removed. --Ginkgo100^talk 01:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was going to write transwiki to Uncyclopedia but it would probably been deleted there as unfunny. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 19:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#A7.SWik78 19:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A7 does not apply to games, pranks, or activities. --Ginkgo100^talk 01:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFT, obviously something made up one day. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:NFT Doc Strange 22:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NFT is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion. --Ginkgo100^talk 01:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have no particular opinion on whether this should be kept, but it is definitely not "something made up one day" in the sense defined by WP:NFT. I rememder this being a fairly common activity when I was a teenager, over 30 years ago. Phil Bridger 13:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I'm not sure whether to keep it, but this is fairly common prank around here and has been around for quite a while. Definitely not made up in one day....I was a victim to this a few years ago! Also, a quick google search shows up many results of people doing the same thing. [1] Knowitall (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete It isn't really much of an article. 2 sentences long, poorly written.TostitosAreGross (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.