Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glory farm - Bicester
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Glory farm - Bicester[edit]
- Glory farm - Bicester (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Orphan article, no references. I'm not quite sure I understand what it's talking about. It seems to be a comparison of various opinions about this place. There are too many unreferenced weasel words for this to be a meaningful encyclopedia article. —Bkell (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. - Mgm|(talk) 10:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Bicester, none of the information in the article is sourced or written in an encyclopaedic tone. Reliably sourced information on the housing estate (?) could be added to the article on the town it's in, if appropriate. Guest9999 (talk) 18:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 23:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The title of the current article fails naming conventions. If you want to redirect, please redirect Glory farm instead. - Mgm|(talk) 00:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no notability, no real content or sources.--Grahame (talk) 01:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 02:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seems like WP:OR. Stephen Turner (Talk) 08:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Bicester, trimming length substantially. MY guess is that this is a housing estate, which needs at most one sentence. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.