Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glorium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as a copyvio of [1]. No prejudice against recreation in non-copyvio form. W.marsh 15:28, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glorium[edit]

Speedy A7 was declined by admin, who conceded that "This sucks." Yeah. It's not referenced, and I don't see WP:BAND. Full disclosure: I haven't read the whole article. Placeholder account 01:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and cleanup. Fair number of hits at http://www.google.com/search?q=glorium, and a lot of them actually seem to be related to the subject at hand. :-)--SarekOfVulcan 01:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. There are a fair few Google results referring to this band, though many are just the official website / Myspace / MSN music type things. However, I did find a few independent sources such as this. I think the fact that most of the band's activity and touring occurred before the advent of the internet means that online sources are always going to be fewer than for an equivalent band that was set up more recently. Overall, I lean towards keep. Will (aka Wimt) 02:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 21:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.