Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global One Lending (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:28, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Global One Lending[edit]
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Global One Lending (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article survived a 2005 VfD (quite a blast from the past) but seems to fall far short of our modern notability requirements. No relevant sources are provided, and a WP:BEFORE search does not find the significant coverage in independent reliable sources required by WP:NCORP. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Lack of independent and reliable references about the company.Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: I am not seeing evidence that the Sacramento-based MLM brokerage active from 2003 to 2007 attained notability to current standards here. Much of the article also concerns the active Oklahoma-based firm of the same name, as does its External Link, so it may be reasonable to consider whether it merits an article; however I am again not seeing evidence that it is notable. AllyD (talk) 10:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 20:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.