Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Investment House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Global Investment House[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no evidence of corporate notability. It existed, and it lost money. Has been deleted before, so we're here v. PROD. Star Mississippi 02:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 02:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 02:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 02:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 02:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While this does have the three independent sources generally needed for notability, I think it falls under subjects known for a single event (even though that rule is mainly for biographies), namely, losing money. The current sources may also be considered routine. A web search did not turn up any further sources. Toadspike (talk) 04:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I tried multiple web search engines, and the only additional source I could find are some articles on https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/global-investment-house - the rest were listings and directories, which is not enough to establish notability per Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies). And the linked articles only involve passing mentions of the article (could be wrong though, didn't look through the articles in detail) Rlink2 (talk) 16:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.