Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Initiatives Symposium in Taiwan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Global Initiatives Symposium in Taiwan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it is a student conference. no suggestion that it has any notability beyond the university where it is held, At best should be merged with National Taiwan University JMWt (talk) 08:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 15:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Article does not meet criteria of Wikipedia:Notability (events). Google search yields approx. 5,000 results when excluding WP and NTU. No significant media coverage. The event is in its 9th year and modeled after St. Gallen Symposium (47 years + 1,000 attendees). GIS event attracts 100 attendees. User:JMWt's proposal to merge content under National Taiwan University is reasonable. I would suggest JMWt add deletion notice to Wikipedia:WikiProject China which has nearly 400 members. I'm not sure how active members on WikiProject Taiwan are but notifying the WikiProject China might have more likelihood for input from Wikipedians interested in editing Chinese-related articles. Czgsq (talk) 01:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.