Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 611

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gliese 611[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. Not visible to the naked eye, and no significant coverage in studies, as required. StringTheory11 (t • c) 21:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete: It's an IAU radial velocity standard star, and I get a couple of borderline hits on "HD 144579". But I don't think it's enough to justify a keep. Praemonitus (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.