Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. Joe Chill (talk) 04:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Glest[edit]
- Glest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this video game. The review in the article doesn't look reliable. Joe Chill (talk) 01:44, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't remember why I created this article to begin with, but it was the first 3D RTS opensource game... so I guess that I may have created it because of this fact. Currently, I don't see any objection against the deletion of that article. Sitenl (talk) 02:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 01:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What about this other review? Pcap ping 04:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There's also this one by a "professional gamer". Pcap ping 04:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep then. Based on those reviews, it's practically the only playable RTS for Linux (rather weak claim for N, I know), but together with the 1reliable+2meh reviews is probably enough. Pcap ping 04:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.