Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Steers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:45, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Glenn Steers[edit]
- Glenn Steers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Porn performer of no discernible significance. Fails all of the tenable PORNBIO alternatives; no reported awards or nominations. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. No reliably sourced biographical information. All references are either promotional pages or databases failing RS standards. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - promotion of a not notable homosexual pornographic actor - Youreallycan 02:32, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, clearly non-notable. Fails general and specific guidelines. Cavarrone (talk) 13:34, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence of reliable, in-depth coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG, nor is this in disputed territory with regard to the proposed changes of WP:PORNBIO. I don't see the need for the use of slurs in this discussion, however. --joe deckertalk to me 18:48, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - also looks like a Copy Paste job - and creator's talk page indicate a deliquency with respect to CPVIO. BO; talk 23:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.