Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glendora Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glendora Review[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. Has been proposed for speedy and prod deletion (added by Triwbe and AnmaFinotera) and removed by creator. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years; hopefully, we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 18:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, this is a difficult one, but lean towards Keep (saying in trepidation awaiting the onslaught from deletionists). The reference cited in the article[1]although highlighting the importance of Glendora, is no more than a passing mention being a review of another book - No Condition is Permanent: Nigeria Writing and the Struggle for Democracy. Other pages found in a search include chimurenga library description [2], on which the article appears to be based, a description of Glendora by Damola Awoyokun, a founder of it(?)[3] and another description by Kunle Tejuoso also closely associated with it[4]. Did find a review by Sulaiman Adebowale for/of the Bellagio Publishing Network[5] which might be usable? Nevertheless, it is cited as references in a number of academic articles ie. African Popular Music (a historical review of sub-Saharan Africa) by Professor John Collins (March 2002)[6]; Group Theory, L-systems, and African Rhythmic Structure by John Belcher of Boston University, and James A. Murrell of Suffolk University [7]; Afrobeat! by Sola Olorunyomi [8]; African literature survival outside the realm of large world publishers: illusion or reality? by Katalin Egri Ku-Mesu of the University of Edinburgh[9]. Academics have contributed to it ie. Chika Okeke-Agulu, Associate Professor of Princeton University[10]; Jonathan Haynes, Professor of English of Long Island University, Brooklyn[11] so may meet WP:TBK? Coolabahapple (talk) 08:11, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm leaning towards keep but I wonder if its creator Olakunle Tejuoso might be more notable; we should certainly consider moving this article as the basis for an article on Olakunle Tejuoso even if it's not quite notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.