Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Maganzini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Tone 14:22, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glen Maganzini[edit]

Nominating for AFD because it fails the basic criteria of WP:BIO. <3 bunny 04:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Could you please explain why this is a candidate for deletion? Perhaps, give some tips as to how to improve this article? I personally do not feel that it, content-wise, is not worthy of staying.

Comment. Please read the guidelines for WP:BIO (the part about notability/importance). <3 bunny 04:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Do you think perhaps the article would meet the criterion better if it stressed his accomplishments at such a young age? Creating a successful website at age 12, etc.. Gmags2003 (talk) 04:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC) -- Gmags2003 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmags2003 (talk • contribs) 04:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Discuss these things on the talk page, the AFD page isn't really for open discussions. <3 bunny 04:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"these things", like the subject's notability are supposed to be discussed right here on this page. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think in this case, you nominated the article for deletion, and the response is how to prevent it from being deleted. I think that's valid. matt91486 (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There are no secondary sources that assert said person's importance. Read WP:BIO, it's easier than me trying to summarize it. <3 bunny 04:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say I was asking. I said the person was. I've hung around AfD enough to know WP:BIO, and I didn't comment keep or delete in this matter. I was just clarifying someone else's point. matt91486 (talk) 04:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; "nesportsnews" only turns up 341 hits [1] and "Glen Maganzini" turns up 439 hits [2]. — Cuyler91093 - Соитяівцтіоиѕ 04:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Gary King (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.