Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen L. Roberts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glen L. Roberts[edit]

Glen L. Roberts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article probably written by Roberts himself. It would need a major re-writing. WP:TNT is a better idea IMHO. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paraguay-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete This article is built around primary documents, not secondary documents showing notability as is required of encyclopedia articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.