Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Davis (sculptor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glen Davis (sculptor)[edit]

Glen Davis (sculptor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete. One sentence of independent coverage. Nothing in te papa. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:51, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:51, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per nom. As with many of the List of people educated at St Peter's College, Auckland another with no notability apart from attending St Peter's School/College, (i.e. none). Is the list itself even wiki-compliant? DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 02:14, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Very little coverage online, a Google search of ("Glen Davis' site:.nz) found two sources, the one in the article and this one,[1] neither enough to meet notability guidelines. Google Books no mention. If the artist had a website sometimes they will list exhibitions which helps in making a case for WP:ARTIST but unable to find evidence of any serious exhibitions. Could be awards but unable to find any. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 22:31, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.