Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gleici Damasceno

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 06:24, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Gleici Damasceno

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Gleici Damasceno (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

tabloid content. It's time we realized that primary claims of this sort "digital influencer" when in the lede mixed with trivia like "being a student of psychology " (she's a undergraduate) and "human rights activist" (she campaigned for a political party) amounts to tabloid coverage of someone only a tabloid would cover. To the extent that we're an encyclopedia , we should remove this. To the extent we include, we're an adjunct to a tabloid that pretends to be called an encyclopedia. Until we develop rules that someone has to have actually done something, we can accommodate this to the GNG by declaring that any source covering this nonsense is to that extent unreliable. . DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

• Strong delete Trillfendi (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable indivudal.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.