Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gleeful: The Real Show Choirs of America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gleeful: The Real Show Choirs of America[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable documentary. Most sources found in a before search are only passing mentions. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as has some reliable sources coverage such as a Guardian piece already in the article Atlantic306 (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 04:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 15:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete I recommend the closing admin to read what the votes are saying (including the nominator which counts) instead of closing this as no consensus. Apart from that Guardian coverage there is not much here. Weak keeping the article based on 1 good reference is not a valid thing in my opinion, because it is still a WP:GNG failure which needs multiple secondary reliable sources covering it in detail. I do not see that here. In my search just like the nom I only found this https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-previews/gleeful-real-show-choirs-america-226743 which is not even covering the thing in detail. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.