Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow Centurions Touch Rugby Club

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 00:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glasgow Centurions Touch Rugby Club[edit]

Glasgow Centurions Touch Rugby Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable amateur rugby team. No evidence of additional sources that would help confer notability. Created and heavily edited by single-purpose account, potentially indicating WP:COI Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I saw a clip where they had been visited by a STV reporter on STV Riverside (A magazine show for Glasgow) a few years back, but I can't see that this was published as a separate story. I don't see any other significant coverage of the club. There is nothing to suggest they are anywhere near meeting WP:SIGCOV or WP:NRU. Drchriswilliams (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non notable Devokewater@ 21:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I would agree with the above comments that there is nothing to suggest the level of coverage or achievement to claim enough notability for an article. Dunarc (talk) 22:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.