Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glance (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nominator indicated a withdrawal of their nomination here but did not apply it to the correct page, and no other editors have recommended deletion or redirection (WP:CSK#1). (non-admin closure) — MarkH₂₁^talk 05:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Glance (company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The non Notable company only having routine coverage with unreliable sources. Fail to pass GNG Sonofstar (talk) 07:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 07:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if someone is improving this article. Cursory search shows that Glance itself, despite just being part of InMobi, is quite notable. It has unicorn status[1], widely consumed in India rivaling Instagram [2], have 100 million daily active users [3]. I am also open to the possibility of merging this to InMobi.SunDawn (talk) 16:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The page editor has a nature of paid editing, whatever the news coverage is added as a source on the page are either unreliable or routine coverage regarding funding.Sonofstar (talk) 17:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Sundown. Mottezen (talk) 00:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this article has enough news source so I think the article meets wikipedia's criteria. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by DasSoumik (talk • contribs) 15:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.