The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article is spam for a commercial site. Rob(Talk) 12:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Simply a couple of lines of half-arsed non-specific VSCA. Hardly worth the trouble. OBM | blah blah blah 12:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 13:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
