Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giulio Romano Vercelli (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Giulio Romano Vercelli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very very very close paraphrase of [1] which is the only source extant, and is not independent or RS. I Speedy'd all three for COPYVIO, but only Gemma Vercelli was accepted as such. So putting both Giulio Romano Vercelli and Renato Vercelli up for AfD. The museum collections are unverifiable, and seem likely to be inflated, as I can't find anything legit about them online or in databases. BTW not this painter by a similar name [2] Theredproject (talk) 15:41, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am usually quite reluctant to agree with deletion of artists from pre-internet era, but for Giulio Vercelli I didn't find even any passing references in google books or any other mentions at all. What convinced me at the end is the price of his works at Invaluable. It's quite hardly to believe that works of notable artist can be sold at couple of hundered of pounds. I will be happily convinced otherwise if someone finds sources. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.