Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giridharilal Kedia

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 February 24.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Giridharilal Kedia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unencyclopedic article about a non-notable person. Little claim of notability is made in the article itself. Unable to find sources. Raziman T V (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Topic is non-notable.Angryapathy (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non notable.--Sodabottle (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as db-bio. WWGB (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, perhaps speedily, as per WWGB above. Doesn't appear to assert any notability to merit inclusion. Cocytus [»talk«] 02:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.