Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgio Perfetti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Perfetti Van Melle. Sandstein 17:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgio Perfetti[edit]

Giorgio Perfetti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Augusto Perfetti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The only source in the article is a shared Forbes profile (not a particularly good source, more like a database entry). I can't find much else, beyond confusion with a similarly named footballer (for ex. this). This is also borderline A7, as being a "billionaire heir" is not a claim to significance, and notability is not inherited from the company they're supposedly a co-owner of. A potential outcome could be redirecting this to the company page.

As to the brother: same issues, and really the only other information is something run-of-the-mill: billionaires buying himself a yacht. Really, that is not the kind of stuff that goes in an encyclopedia. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Perfetti Van Melle - a sensible suggestion. Most of the "coverage" here is of Giorgio and its absolutely not "significant coverage". Despite being fairly private, he has confirmed he owns a rare car, another (same make and model) of which was the subject of a legal dispute. To indicate its rarity (and explain the dispute) he is regularly mentioned incidentally among a list of wealthy people who own said car. So at first glance there are dozens and dozens of articles that mention him, but passing mentions are all they are. I couldn't find anything of substance. Stlwart111 04:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • And to clarify, I mean redirect both; RandomCanadian has listed two articles here and I feel they should both the treated the same way. Stlwart111 04:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect-per Stalwart111. Best Regards.---✨LazyManiik✨ 05:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Sockpuppet of blocked user Lazy Maniik. plicit 14:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.