Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgi Aburjania (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G4 — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:12, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgi Aburjania[edit]

Giorgi Aburjania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion per WP:G4 was declined by a non-admin without providing a reason, and should therefore still apply in my opinion as the article is not sufficiently different from the one that was deleted yesterday. In any case, the underlying issue persists. Mr. Aburjania has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and SALT - still fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. I am unsure why @ChrisAnorthosis: has removed the G4 tag, they are not an admin and so don't know what the previous article looked like. I am and can confirm they are similar enough for the G4 tag to be considered valid, but whatever, we're here now. I would also advise the article creator @Anola177: that repeatedly re-creating the same non-notable article is disruptive and might result in a block should it continue. GiantSnowman 21:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman: Given that WP:G4 so unambiguously applies here and that ChrisAnorthosis is not an admin and did not provide a reason for remvoing the G4 tag, are you not permitted to delete the article despite their objections? Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:54, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly, but given the fact I have expressed an opinion to 'delete' the article here, I would be considered INVOLVED. I will, however, re-add a G4 tag. GiantSnowman 16:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.