Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gioconda Vessichelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR) (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gioconda Vessichelli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo/fan article about a non-notable singer. Despite the enthusiastic article and reasonable number of references she fails WP:GNG. Very few ghits; the "awards" are mostly honourable mentions in minor competitions. Andyjsmith (talk) 14:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Gioconda is a known singer, her fanpage has hundreds of thousands of fans, a lot of followers to all her posts, and in just one hour she has got almost 350.000 views on facebook live chat:

https://www.facebook.com/giocondasinger/videos/749720841835080/

The competition she won are actually important, and newspaper articles have been written about these competitions

Considering the number of people following her, her singing in the soundtrack of Bollywood movie Prague, singing the song "Thodi Daaru" with famous Indian singer Mika Singh, the competitions she won, she deserves of being mentioned in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.186.230.180 (talk) 15:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.