Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gino ninja
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. No Guru 19:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Gino ninja[edit]
Unverifiable or non-notable neologism. None of the google results for "gino ninja" mention the neologism. SCHZMO ✍ 12:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Tom Harrison Talk 13:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as I can get no google hits on this one. Fails WP:NOR quite prolly. -- Grafikm_fr (AutoGRAF) 13:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete patent nonsense - Politepunk 14:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete; vanity with no claim of notability. --Allen 14:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as patent nonsense. And I mean nonsense. FYI, as if the article itself was not enough proof, the "sociologist" listed, "Keegan Caradonna," is found through a quick Google search to be a 16-year-old amateur competitive video game player. -- Kicking222 14:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy G1 --Terence Ong 14:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, as this also seems to be clearly 'private terminology', as coined by the "linguist André Müller". ;) --N-true 15:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A group of Canadian students who like to crash parties? {{db-group}} candidate. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete G1 tagged.-Whomp 18:43, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.