Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gimmick weapon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gimmick weapon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No verifiable content. The term is generic and there are no references to it being used to refer to Westerns in particular. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 02:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - While the term "gimmick weapon" is one that is used, I'm finding no evidence that this has ever been used as a specific, notable term in regards to Westerns. As such, it not only fails in terms on notability, but also appears to be entirely WP:OR. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:51, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It doesn't seem like this is a notable term._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.